optical fiber: suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.76
, substrate
Weight: 0.72
, light source
Weight: 0.66
, structure
Weight: 0.65
Siblings amplifier
Weight: 0.64
, silicon
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, polymer
Weight: 0.35
, filament
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire 1.00
is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference 0.84
is cable immune to electromagnetic interference 0.84
is optic cable immune to interference 0.83
is electromagnetic interference 0.83
is cable immune to interference 0.82
be preferred over copper wires for communication 0.80
is interference 0.79
be preferred over copper wires 0.79
be better than wires transmitting 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)