optical fiber: be preferred over copper wires for communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.76
, substrate
Weight: 0.72
, light source
Weight: 0.66
, structure
Weight: 0.65
Siblings amplifier
Weight: 0.64
, silicon
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, polymer
Weight: 0.35
, filament
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred over copper wires for communication 1.00
be preferred over copper wires 0.97
is optic cable better than copper cable 0.84
connecting wires 0.83
be better than copper 0.82
be better than wires transmitting 0.81
is optic cables better 0.80
suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire 0.80
be used in communication 0.80
be optic cables 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiber, be used in communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fiber, be used in communication)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be used in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiber, be used in communication)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be used in communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be used in communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be used in communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be used in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fiber, be used in communication)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fiber, be used in communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)