loop: have heights in roller coaster

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, maneuver
Weight: 0.57
, topology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings helix
Weight: 0.32
, bight
Weight: 0.32
, system
Weight: 0.32
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have heights in roller coaster 1.00
be on roller coasters 0.87
is put on roller coasters 0.86
be vital in roller coasters 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(loop, have heights in roller coaster)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(loop, be on roller coasters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(loop, be on roller coasters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(loop, is put on roller coasters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(loop, be vital in roller coasters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be on roller coasters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(loop, is put on roller coasters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(loop, is put on roller coasters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(loop, be vital in roller coasters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loop, be on roller coasters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loop, be vital in roller coasters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(loop, is put on roller coasters)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(loop, be vital in roller coasters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(loop, have heights in roller coaster)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(loop, have heights in roller coaster)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(loop, have heights in roller coaster)