loop: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, maneuver
Weight: 0.57
, topology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings helix
Weight: 0.32
, bight
Weight: 0.32
, system
Weight: 0.32
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is darn expensive 0.83
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(system, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(loop, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(loop, is darn expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(loop, is darn expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(loop, is darn expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is darn expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(loop, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(loop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)