los angeles: be a part of california

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63
, disneyland
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of california 1.00
be defined as name of city in california 0.92
be a part of texas 0.81
be locate in illinois 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be a part of california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be a part of california)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be a part of texas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be locate in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(san jose, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(san jose, be a part of california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(san diego, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(san diego, be a part of california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san diego, be defined as name of city in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(san antonio, be a part of texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be a part of texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(los angeles, be a part of california)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(los angeles, be defined as name of city in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(los angeles, be a part of california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(san diego, be a part of california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(san jose, be a part of california)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(san antonio, be a part of texas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san diego, be defined as name of city in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be a part of california)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(los angeles, be a part of california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chicago, be locate in illinois)