los angeles: be warmer than oklahoma city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than oklahoma city 1.00
be warmer than san francisco 0.83
be warmer than san diego 0.81
be better than francisco 0.78
be hotter than san diego 0.77
be better than new york 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(los angeles, be better than new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)