los angeles: city of angels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
city of angels 1.00
be city of angels 1.00
be called city of angels 0.99
be named city of angels 0.95
be known as city of angels 0.95
be called city of lost angels 0.92
be nicknamed city of angels 0.88
be called city of fallen angels 0.87
have wearing on jerseys angels 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(los angeles, city of angels)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(los angeles, city of angels)