los angeles: be nicknamed city of angels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nicknamed city of angels 1.00
be named city of angels 0.92
be known as city of angels 0.91
be called city of angels 0.91
be nicknamed city 0.89
be city of angels 0.89
city of angels 0.88
be called city of lost angels 0.87
be called city of fallen angels 0.83
have wearing on jerseys angels 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(los angeles, city of angels)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, city of angels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(los angeles, city of angels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of angels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(los angeles, be named city of angels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(los angeles, be city of angels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(los angeles, city of angels)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(los angeles, be known as city of angels)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of fallen angels)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city of lost angels)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(los angeles, have wearing on jerseys angels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)