san antonio: be nicknamed city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nicknamed alamo city 1.00
be nicknamed city 1.00
be called city 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new york, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called city)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be called city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(san francisco, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed alamo city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(san antonio, be nicknamed alamo city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed alamo city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed alamo city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be called city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(san antonio, be called city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be called city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(san antonio, be called city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be called city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)