los angeles: be nicknamed city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nicknamed city 1.00
be nicknamed city of angels 0.89
be named city 0.82
be known as city 0.80
be called city 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(san francisco, be called city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicago, be called city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, be known as city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be known as city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be called city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be called city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be known as city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chicago, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(san francisco, be called city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicago, be called city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(seattle, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(seattle, be known as city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(san antonio, be called city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be called city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(seattle, be called city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(seattle, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be named city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be known as city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(los angeles, be known as city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city of angels)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(los angeles, be named city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be known as city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be named city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(los angeles, be called city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(los angeles, be named city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(los angeles, be known as city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chicago, be known as city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chicago, be called city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(san antonio, be nicknamed city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be called city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(san antonio, be called city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(seattle, be known as city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chicago, be known as city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chicago, be called city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(los angeles, be nicknamed city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be called city)