lost: be in space bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, cost
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings beat
Weight: 0.33
, falling
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.32
, hurt
Weight: 0.32
, last
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in space bad 1.00
be in space 0.92
is izalith bad 0.80
have bad headohones 0.80
is bad now 0.80
be in space girl black 0.78
be bad days 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(loss, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lost, be in space bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tv show, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lost, be in space bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tv show, be bad days)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(loss, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tv show, be bad days)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(beat, have bad headohones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(loss, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lost, be in space bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tv show, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lost, be in space bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(beat, have bad headohones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(beat, have bad headohones)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beat, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lost, be in space bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lost, be in space)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lost, be in space)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space girl black)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lost, be in space girl black)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lost, be in space bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tv show, be bad days)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(loss, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beat, have bad headohones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beat, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tv show, be bad days)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(lost, be in space bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(loss, has quality bad)