louisiana: be state with parishes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.58
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.58
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be state with parishes 1.00
have parishes 0.98
be divided into parishes 0.92
have counties 0.79
have seven districts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, have counties)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(louisiana, have parishes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be divided into parishes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(louisiana, be divided into parishes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(louisiana, be divided into parishes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be divided into parishes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have counties)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have parishes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(louisiana, have counties)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(louisiana, have parishes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have parishes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have counties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state with parishes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state with parishes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have counties)