love: be important in friendship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents love song
Weight: 0.70
, ideal
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.64
, magic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings grace
Weight: 0.70
, romance
Weight: 0.61
, affection
Weight: 0.57
, sorrow
Weight: 0.56
, agape
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in friendship 1.00
be important in relationship 0.86
complicate friendship 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(affection, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(affection, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(affection, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(love, be important in friendship)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(love, be important in relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(love, be important in relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(love, complicate friendship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(love, complicate friendship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(love, be important in relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(love, complicate friendship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(love, complicate friendship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(love, be important in friendship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(affection, be important in relationship)