luggage: have expensive items

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.58 , time Weight: 0.56 , service Weight: 0.56 , container Weight: 0.55 , car Weight: 0.55
Siblings	trash bag Weight: 0.34 , suitcase Weight: 0.34 , cargo Weight: 0.33 , air travel Weight: 0.32 , police car Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have expensive items	1.00
have items	0.94
is expensive	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(container, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(luggage, have expensive items)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(container, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(container, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(suitcase, have expensive items)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(suitcase, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(trash bag, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(suitcase, have items)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(container, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(luggage, have expensive items)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(suitcase, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(suitcase, have expensive items)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(suitcase, have items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(suitcase, have items)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(trash bag, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(trash bag, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(suitcase, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(suitcase, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(air travel, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(air travel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(luggage, have expensive items)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(luggage, have items)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(luggage, have items)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(luggage, have items)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(luggage, is expensive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(luggage, is expensive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(luggage, is expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(luggage, is expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(luggage, have expensive items)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(container, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(suitcase, have items)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(suitcase, have expensive items)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(trash bag, is expensive)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(suitcase, is expensive)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(air travel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(luggage, have expensive items) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(container, is expensive)