luggage: have items

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, time
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.56
, container
Weight: 0.55
, car
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, suitcase
Weight: 0.34
, cargo
Weight: 0.33
, air travel
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have items 1.00
have expensive items 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, have expensive items)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, have items)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(suitcase, have items)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(suitcase, have items)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(suitcase, have expensive items)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(suitcase, have expensive items)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(luggage, have items)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have expensive items)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(luggage, have expensive items)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(luggage, have expensive items)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(luggage, have expensive items)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(luggage, have items)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(suitcase, have items)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(luggage, have items)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(suitcase, have expensive items)