lumber: be more expensive now

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.61
, cargo
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood
Weight: 0.59
, cedar
Weight: 0.55
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.39
, timber
Weight: 0.37
, steel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive now 1.00
be less dense than water 0.77
cost money 0.77
be hard than plastic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(product, cost money)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(product, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(product, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(product, cost money)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lumber, be more expensive now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(product, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wood, be less dense than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(product, cost money)