wood: be less dense than water

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
, lumber
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.63
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less dense than water 1.00
be more expensive now 0.77
be hard than plastic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wood, be less dense than water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be more expensive now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lumber, be more expensive now)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wood, be less dense than water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wood, be less dense than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(wood, be less dense than water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lumber, be more expensive now)