lymph: is node biopsy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lymphatic system
Weight: 0.66
, tissue
Weight: 0.65
, body part
Weight: 0.55
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.54
, organ
Weight: 0.50
Siblings lymph node
Weight: 0.39
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.36
, circulatory system
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35
, endocrine gland
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is node biopsy 1.00
is node biopsy done 0.99
nodes 0.82
has physical part nodes 0.81
function of is nodes 0.80
has shape nodes 0.80
enter lymph nodes 0.79
is biopsied 0.79
is retroperitoneal 0.79
be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is biopsied)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lymph node, is biopsied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lymph node, is biopsied)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lymph, is node biopsy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lymph, nodes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lymph, is node biopsy done)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lymph, has physical part nodes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lymph, enter lymph nodes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(lymph, has physical part nodes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lymph, function of is nodes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lymph, has shape nodes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lymph, enter lymph nodes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lymph, has physical part nodes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lymph, has shape nodes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lymph, enter lymph nodes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(lymph, nodes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lymph, has shape nodes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lymph, function of is nodes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lymph, has shape nodes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lymph, function of is nodes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lymph, has physical part nodes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lymph, nodes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lymph, enter lymph nodes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(lymph, nodes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lymph, function of is nodes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lymph node, is biopsied)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)