lymph: is node biopsy done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lymphatic system
Weight: 0.66
, tissue
Weight: 0.65
, body part
Weight: 0.55
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.54
, organ
Weight: 0.50
Siblings lymph node
Weight: 0.39
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.36
, circulatory system
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35
, endocrine gland
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is node biopsy done 1.00
is node biopsy 0.99
is biopsied 0.80
has physical part nodes 0.80
nodes 0.80
has shape nodes 0.80
function of is nodes 0.79
be removed in loop excision procedure 0.78
is retroperitoneal 0.78
enter lymph nodes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is biopsied)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lymph node, is biopsied)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lymph node, is biopsied)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lymph, is node biopsy done)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lymph, is node biopsy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lymph, nodes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lymph, has physical part nodes)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lymph, is node biopsy done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lymph, is node biopsy done)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lymph node, is biopsied)