lysosome: is is compared as garbage centers of city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organelle
Weight: 0.70
, vacuole
Weight: 0.47
, vesicle
Weight: 0.46
, enzyme
Weight: 0.43
, compartment
Weight: 0.42
Siblings cell membrane
Weight: 0.38
, mitochondrion
Weight: 0.35
, ribosome
Weight: 0.35
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.35
, cytoskeleton
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is compared as garbage centers of city 1.00
be like cell recycling stations 0.77
be related to city 0.77
be compared to school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lysosome, be compared to school)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lysosome, be compared to school)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be compared to school)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lysosome, be related to city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be compared to school)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lysosome, be like cell recycling stations)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be related to city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(lysosome, be related to city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be related to city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, is is compared as garbage centers of city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city)