mac: be for design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for design 1.00
be used for design 0.97
be good for design 0.96
be better for design 0.95
be for best design 0.93
be preferred for design 0.89
be for graphic design 0.87
be used for graphic design 0.87
be better for graphic design 0.87
be seen as better for design work 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mac, be for design)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mac, be used for design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be good for design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mac, be used for design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mac, be good for design)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be better for design)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mac, be better for design)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for design)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mac, be good for design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for design)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mac, be preferred for design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mac, be preferred for design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be preferred for design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mac, be preferred for design)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for graphic design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mac, be for design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be for design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be for design)