mac: be good for design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for design 1.00
be better for design 0.96
be for design 0.96
be for best design 0.95
be used for design 0.94
be seen as better for design work 0.90
be seen as better for creative design work 0.89
be good for graphic design 0.88
be preferred for design 0.88
be better for graphic design 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mac, be good for design)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mac, be better for design)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mac, be for design)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be better for design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be for design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mac, be used for design)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mac, be used for design)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for design)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mac, be for design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mac, be good for graphic design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for design)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mac, be preferred for design)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for graphic design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mac, be preferred for design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be preferred for design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mac, be for design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mac, be preferred for design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mac, be good for design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be good for design)