mac: be more expensive than pcs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than pcs 1.00
cost more than pcs 0.97
be better than pcs 0.96
be less powerful than pcs 0.95
be faster than pcs 0.95
be less powerful than other pcs 0.95
be more reliable than pcs 0.94
seem last longer than pcs 0.93
have less memory than pcs 0.93
crash less than pcs 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be better than pcs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than pcs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mac, be better than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than pcs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)