machine: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.60
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, sound
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.75
, grinder
Weight: 0.72
, treadmill
Weight: 0.71
, engine
Weight: 0.68
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
be more efficient than compound machines 0.85
be considered more intelligent 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(machine, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(machine, be more efficient than compound machines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(machine, be more efficient than compound machines)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(machine, be more efficient than compound machines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(machine, be considered more intelligent)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(machine, be considered more intelligent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(machine, be considered more intelligent)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(machine, be more efficient than compound machines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(machine, be considered more intelligent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(machine, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)