:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(macro, work in excel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(action, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(macro, work in excel)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(action, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(action, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(economy, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(macro, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(macro, work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(macro, work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(macro, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(action, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in excel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(economy, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child