magic: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents legend
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.57
, science
Weight: 0.56
Siblings miracle
Weight: 0.33
, genius
Weight: 0.33
, trick
Weight: 0.33
, joy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
was used in 1600s 0.79
be invented in harry potter universe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(science, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(magic, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(magic, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(magic, was used in 1600s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(magic, be invented in harry potter universe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(magic, be invented in harry potter universe)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(magic, be invented in harry potter universe)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was used in 1600s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(magic, be invented in harry potter universe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(magic, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)