:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wren, vomit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, vomit)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wren, vomit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(wren, vomit)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(magpie, vomit)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(magpie, vomit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(magpie, vomit)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(seagull, vomit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wren, vomit)