magpie: vomit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
, scavenger
Weight: 0.46
, creature
Weight: 0.36
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
vomit 1.00
eat feces 0.82
eat dog poop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wren, vomit)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seagull, vomit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(seagull, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(seagull, vomit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wren, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(wren, vomit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(magpie, vomit)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(magpie, eat feces)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(magpie, eat feces)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat feces)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(magpie, eat feces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(magpie, vomit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(seagull, vomit)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magpie, vomit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wren, vomit)