maintenance: be at time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at time 1.00
be at worst time 0.80
one at least 0.79
be equal to two things at once 0.79
be in organisations 0.79
be in 1773 0.79
be for water day by day 0.79
be equal at once 0.78
be bad at night 0.78
be for ftms 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(variable, be equal to two things at once)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(activity, be in organisations)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, one at least)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(variable, one at least)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(activity, be in organisations)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(variable, be equal to two things at once)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(activity, be in organisations)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(variable, be equal to two things at once)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(variable, one at least)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(watering, be bad at night)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(variable, be equal to two things at once)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(activity, be in organisations)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, one at least)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(watering, be bad at night)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(watering, be bad at night)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(maintenance, be at time)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(maintenance, be at worst time)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at worst time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(variable, one at least)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(variable, be equal to two things at once)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(activity, be in organisations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watering, be bad at night)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(variable, one at least)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(variable, be equal to two things at once)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(maintenance, be at time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(activity, be in organisations)