maintenance: be at worst time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at worst time 1.00
be at time 0.80
one at least 0.78
be bad at night 0.77
be in middle of day bad 0.76
be bad in bulgaria 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, one at least) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at worst time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(variable, one at least)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(variable, one at least)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(watering, be bad at night)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, one at least) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(watering, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(watering, be bad at night)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(watering, be in middle of day bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(maintenance, be at worst time)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be at time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(maintenance, be at time)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(maintenance, be at worst time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(variable, one at least)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(watering, be bad at night)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watering, be in middle of day bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(maintenance, be at worst time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(variable, one at least)