mall: be in london red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london red 1.00
be in london 0.95
be in london closed 0.90
be in manhattan 0.78
be in detroit cheap 0.78
be cheap in florida 0.78
be in detroit 0.77
be expensive in seattle 0.77
is jacksonville florida 0.77
dallas tx 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in detroit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be cheap in florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in detroit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in detroit cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(department store, be in london)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london red)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london red)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(department store, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(department store, be in london)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mall, be in london red)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mall, be in london)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mall, be in london closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london closed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mall, be in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(mall, be in london closed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london closed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mall, is jacksonville florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(department store, be in london)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mall, be in london red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in florida)