mall: is chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is chicago 1.00
dallas tx 0.82
is kansas city missouri 0.81
is miami 0.81
be in detroit 0.81
be expensive in seattle 0.81
is jacksonville florida 0.80
is houston 0.80
is wisconsin 0.80
be in detroit cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in detroit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in detroit)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in detroit cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mall, is chicago)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mall, is chicago)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(real estate, be in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mall, is chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mall, is chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mall, is miami)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mall, is miami)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mall, is wisconsin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mall, is miami)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mall, is miami)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mall, is wisconsin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mall, is houston)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mall, is kansas city missouri)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mall, is houston)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mall, is wisconsin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, is kansas city missouri)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mall, is kansas city missouri)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mall, is wisconsin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, is kansas city missouri)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mall, is jacksonville florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mall, is jacksonville florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in detroit cheap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, is chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)