mall: is houston

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is houston 1.00
dallas tx 0.85
is miami 0.83
is jacksonville florida 0.82
be expensive in seattle 0.81
is kansas city missouri 0.81
be cheap in texas 0.80
is kansas city mo 0.80
is chicago 0.80
is florida 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(real estate, be cheap in texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be cheap in texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mall, is houston)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mall, is houston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(shopping mall, is florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, is florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mall, is houston)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mall, is miami)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mall, is miami)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mall, is miami)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mall, is miami)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mall, is houston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in texas)