mall: look same

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
look same 1.00
compare to areas shown in same color 0.79
be different 0.76
better looking people than other stores 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, look same)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(area, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mall, look same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mall, look same)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mall, better looking people than other stores)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mall, look same)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, look same)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(area, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mall, look same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(area, be different)