malta: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.66
, island
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.56
, state
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.51
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.36
, bahrain
Weight: 0.36
, kosovo
Weight: 0.35
, ellis island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is developed country 0.91
is developing 0.84
is developing country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(malta, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(malta, is developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(malta, is developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(malta, is developing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(malta, is developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)