malta: is good country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.66
, island
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.56
, state
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.51
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.36
, bahrain
Weight: 0.36
, kosovo
Weight: 0.35
, ellis island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good country 1.00
is country 0.91
was important country to emopire 0.90
was important country to brithish emopire 0.90
was important country to empire 0.79
has quality good 0.79
is developing country 0.79
is developed country 0.78
is speaking country 0.77
was important country to british empire 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(state, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(state, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bahrain, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(kosovo, is country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(malta, is good country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(malta, is good country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(malta, is good country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(kosovo, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kosovo, is country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bahrain, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bahrain, is country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(zambia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zambia, is country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(malta, is good country)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(malta, is country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(malta, is country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(malta, is country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(malta, is speaking country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(malta, is speaking country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(malta, is speaking country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(malta, is developing country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(malta, is developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(malta, is speaking country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(malta, is developed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to british empire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(malta, is country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to british empire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to empire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to empire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to british empire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(malta, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(malta, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to british empire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to empire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to empire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(malta, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(malta, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(kosovo, is country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bahrain, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(zambia, is country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(malta, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)