mammoth: be at ice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ice 1.00
be at siberian ice 0.93
be at glacial ice 0.86
be at freeze glacier 0.77
be at freeze arctic tundra 0.76
be at glacier 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at ice)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at ice)