man: has walk on moon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
has walk on moon 1.00
has land on moon 0.88
be walk in mountain 0.79
walk beach 0.77
be walk along beach 0.77
walk up street 0.77
walk down street 0.76
walk across street 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(woman, walk up street)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, has walk on moon)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(woman, walk down street)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, has walk on moon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(woman, walk down street)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(woman, walk up street)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(woman, walk up street)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(woman, walk down street)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(woman, walk up street)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(woman, walk down street)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(man, has walk on moon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(man, has walk on moon)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(man, has land on moon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(man, has land on moon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(man, has land on moon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(man, be walk in mountain)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(man, has land on moon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, has walk on moon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woman, walk up street)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(woman, walk down street)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woman, walk up street)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(man, has walk on moon)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(woman, walk down street)