man: prefer women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
prefer yiff to women 1.00
prefer women 1.00
prefer white women 0.96
prefer women to black 0.95
prefer yiff to real women 0.94
prefer smaller women 0.93
prefer older women 0.92
prefer women than latinas 0.92
prefer younger women 0.92
prefer dogs to women 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer women)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(young man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(young man, prefer women)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(young man, prefer older women)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(young man, prefer older women)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(man, prefer women)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, prefer younger women)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, prefer younger women)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(man, prefer younger women)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer younger women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, prefer women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(young man, prefer older women)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(man, prefer women)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(young man, prefer women)