management: differ from bottom line management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from bottom line management 1.00
differ from line management 0.95
differ in terms 0.80
differ from types 0.79
differ from types of matter 0.79
differ from other types of matter 0.79
differ from other types 0.79
be important to business management 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(solution, differ from other types of matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, differ from bottom line management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(solution, differ from other types of matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(solution, differ from other types of matter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(solution, differ from other types of matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(management, differ from bottom line management)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, differ from line management)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, differ from line management)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(management, differ from line management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from line management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(management, be important to business management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, be important to business management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(management, be important to business management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, differ from bottom line management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(solution, differ from other types of matter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(management, differ from bottom line management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(solution, differ from other types of matter)