management: be important to business management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business management 1.00
be important in business 0.90
affect business 0.83
be important in company 0.80
differ from line management 0.78
is good investment 0.77
be called resource manager 0.76
be primary component in entrepreneurial activity 0.76
be important factor in entrepreneurial activity 0.76
differ from bottom line management 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(neo, is good investment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(neo, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(neo, is good investment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called resource manager)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(management, be important to business management)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(management, affect business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, affect business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, differ from line management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(management, affect business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(management, affect business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(management, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from line management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from bottom line management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(management, differ from line management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, differ from line management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(management, be important in company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(management, differ from bottom line management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, differ from bottom line management)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, differ from bottom line management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, be important to business management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(neo, is good investment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(operating system, be called resource manager)