management: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be called process 0.87
be called social process 0.83
is universal process 0.79
has physical part muscles 0.78
has physical part features 0.78
be called universally social process 0.76
be necessary component of computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has physical part features)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(neo, has physical part muscles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(neo, has physical part muscles)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(neo, has physical part muscles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(operating system, has physical part features)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(operating system, has physical part features)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(management, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(management, be called process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be called social process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(management, is universal process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(management, be called process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(management, be called universally social process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(management, is universal process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(management, be called process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, be called process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(management, be called social process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(management, be called social process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(management, be called social process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(management, is universal process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(management, be called universally social process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(management, be called universally social process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(management, is universal process)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(management, be called universally social process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(management, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(neo, has physical part muscles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(operating system, has physical part features)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(storage, be necessary component of computer)