management: is universal process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is universal process 1.00
is universal 0.91
be called process 0.81
be called universally social process 0.81
be called social process 0.79
has physical part process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(management, is universal process)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(management, be called process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, is universal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(management, has physical part process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(management, be called social process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(management, is universal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(management, is universal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, be called process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(management, has physical part process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(management, be called universally social process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(management, be called social process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(management, be called process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(management, be called universally social process)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(management, is universal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(management, be called social process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(management, has physical part process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(management, be called universally social process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(management, be called universally social process)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be called social process)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(management, be called process)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(management, is universal process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(management, is universal process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(management, is universal process)