management: is essential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is essential 1.00
be important 40 0.83
is necessary 0.83
is good important 0.80
is useful 0.76
be necessary component of computer 0.76
is basic 0.76
be important to life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is useful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solution, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(variable, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(solution, be important to life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(solution, be important to life)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(storage, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(management, is essential)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(management, is essential)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is useful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(management, is essential)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solution, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(management, is essential)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(storage, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(storage, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(management, is essential)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(management, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, is necessary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(management, is necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(management, is good important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(management, is necessary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(management, is good important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(management, is good important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(management, is good important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(management, is essential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(variable, is useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(solution, be important to life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(storage, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(variable, is useful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(management, is essential)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(solution, be important to life)