management: is good important

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is good important	1.00
be important 40	0.91
be important for us	0.86
is very important	0.86
be important to things	0.85
has quality good	0.84
be important for country	0.81
be important to life	0.81
be important in business	0.81
be significant for us	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(industry, be important for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(industry, be important for country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(solution, be important to life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(industry, be important for us)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(solution, be important to life)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(industry, be important for country)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(industry, be significant for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for us)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for country)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(solution, be important to life)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(storage, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(industry, be important for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(industry, be important for country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(solution, be important to life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(neo, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(storage, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(storage, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(management, is good important)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(management, is very important)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(management, be important in business)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(management, is very important)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(management, is very important)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, is very important)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(management, be important in business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(solution, be important to life)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(neo, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(storage, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(solution, be important to life)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)