operating system: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.73
, operation
Weight: 0.73
, solution
Weight: 0.70
, function
Weight: 0.66
, free software
Weight: 0.66
Siblings system
Weight: 0.37
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.36
, nervous system
Weight: 0.35
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality question 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(operating system, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(operating system, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(operating system, has quality question)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality questions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(operating system, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operating system, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(operating system, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)