operating system: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.73
, operation
Weight: 0.73
, solution
Weight: 0.70
, function
Weight: 0.66
, free software
Weight: 0.66
Siblings system
Weight: 0.37
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.36
, nervous system
Weight: 0.35
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(operating system, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operating system, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(operating system, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(operating system, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(operating system, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(operating system, is best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)