operating system: has quality questions

Related concepts

Parents	computer program Weight: 0.73 , operation Weight: 0.73 , solution Weight: 0.70 , function Weight: 0.66 , free software Weight: 0.66
Siblings	system Weight: 0.37 , central processing unit Weight: 0.36 , nervous system Weight: 0.35 , central nervous system Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality questions	1.00
has quality question	0.92
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(operating system, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(operating system, has quality question)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(operating system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)