manager: be interested in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in business 1.00
be interested in manpower planning 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(employee, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(employee, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(employee, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(employee, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(manager, be interested in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(owner, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manager, be interested in business)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in manpower planning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(employee, be interested in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(employee, be interested in business)