manchester: be described as industrial city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as industrial city 1.00
be described as first industrial city 0.98
be described as city 0.91
be described as first city 0.88
is city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leeds, is city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leeds, is city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(melbourne, is city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as first industrial city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(manchester, is city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as first industrial city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as first city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(manchester, is city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as first industrial city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as first industrial city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(manchester, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as first city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as first city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as first city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leeds, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(melbourne, is city)